Increasing Urban Community Empowerment through Changing of Poverty Rate Index on the Productive Zakat Impact Proceeding: 4th International Seminar on Sustainable Urban Development (ISoSUD) 9th - 10th August 2017, Ciputra Hotel, Jakarta, Indonesia

Main Article Content

Muhammad Hasbi Zaenal Amelya Dwi Astuti Ayu Solihah Sadariyah

Abstract

We show how changes in poverty measures can be applied into growth of islamic philanthropy distribution via zakat, and we use the methodology to zakat community development (ZCD) program in Bantul during the 2016. The purpose of the present paper is to prove zakat is able to be a solution part for the community empowerment. The result is the number of productive zakat program beneficiaries whose income is below the poverty line (poor category) before the program are 244 people (H = 0.171) and after the program change to 168 (H = 0.118), which means the program has succeeded in reducing the number of poor people by 76 people (5.34 percent). The poverty gap (P1) of beneficiaries of productive zakat program in Bantul also decrease. The gap between poverty line and average income of beneficiaries is Rp 63,763 before the program, while the gap after the program is Rp 56,992. The income gap (I) is also decline from 0.197 to 0.169. Poverty severity of beneficiaries of productive zakat program in Bantul seen by Sen Index (P2) decrease from 0.093 to 0.062, while using Foster-Greer-Thorbecke Index (P3), the poverty severity decrease from 0.010 to 0.004. The analysis revealed the zakat community empowerment was significant economically in suppressing the poverty rate, and possible for reducing inequality and ending poverty in Indonesia.


Keywords: Zakat, Indonesia Poverty, Inequality Economics, Economics Growth


JEL Classification: O15, O53, P36

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
ZAENAL, Muhammad Hasbi; DWI ASTUTI, Amelya; SOLIHAH SADARIYAH, Ayu. Increasing Urban Community Empowerment through Changing of Poverty Rate Index on the Productive Zakat Impact. Conference - Puskas BAZNAS, [S.l.], sep. 2017. Available at: <http://www.iconzbaznas.com/publications/index.php/conferences/article/view/69>. Date accessed: 01 feb. 2026.
Section
Articles

References

Amartya Sen (1976) Poverty: An Ordinal Approach to Measurement, Econometrica. 44 (2): 219–231. JSTOR 191271

Bellù, Lorenzo Giovanni & Liberati, Paolo (2005) Social Welfare Analysis of Income Distributions: Ranking Income Distributions with Crossing Generalised Lorenz Curves. University Library of Munich, Germany in its series MPRA Paper with number 30115

BAZNAS. Zakat Outlook 2017. Center of Strategic Studies http://www.puskasbaznas.com/publications/books/293-outlook-zakat-indonesia-2017-english

Chakravarty, S.R. (2009) Inequality, Polarization and Poverty. Springer, New York

David B. Grusky and Ravi Kanbur (2006) Poverty And Inequality. Stanford University Press. ISBN: 9780804748421

Frank, Ellen (2006) Dollar: How Is Poverty Defined in Government Statistics?.Dollars & Sense magazine.

Peter Edelman (2012) Poverty in America: Why Can’t We End It?. The New York Times.

Sabates, Ricardo (2008) The Impact of Lifelong Learning on Poverty Reduction" (PDF), IFLL Public Value Paper 1. Latimer Trend,Plymouth, UK: 5–6. ISBN 978 1 86201 3797.

The World Bank (2015) 1.4 Billion Live On Less Than US$1.25 A Day, But Progress Against Poverty Remains Strong.

The World Bank (2005) Poverty Manual. JH Revision.

United Nations (2008) Millennium Development Goal Indicators.

Walter Skeat (2005) An Etymological Dictionary of the English Language. Dover Publications. ISBN 978-0486440521.

Most read articles by the same author(s)